Skip to main content

Event Planning and Business Entertainment in the U.S. Corporate World

A liberal democracy can survive for a while on institutional strength and widespread agreement. As long as most people are generally satisfied with how things are going (or have made peace with the status quo), it is easy to imagine that something like a social contract will keep things on track. Hamish MacAuley makes a persuasive case that many Canadians came of age politically between the collapse of the Berlin Wall and the 2008 financial crisis, when consensus was widespread and politics seemed optional, thus many chose to stay out. We abandoned democratic governing habits during prosperous times. Instead, we played politics. In response, McGill's Jacob T. Levy advocates for political action that rejects the status quo while also refusing to burn it all down or take our ball and go home. We should participate in politics, even if it is unsatisfying. When the foundations of our democratic structure or the rights of vulnerable people are jeopardized, it makes sense to delegate aut

Brazil-U.S. Relations: Cooperation or Conflict?

 The relationship between the United States and Brazil is intricate and profound, with persistent issues that both bolster and strain the relationship. Nevertheless, the context in which these issues are situated has undergone a significant and swift transformation. In each of these cases, the challenges have been exacerbated by both domestic and international trends: democracy and governance; climate change; criminality; and sustainable development. In order for the relationship to progress, it will be necessary for both parties to adjust. However, there is an additional obstacle: the two nations hold divergent perspectives on the changing international order, particularly in relation to China's role. In order to further its global ambitions, Brazil must revise its comprehension of the geopolitical dynamic in which it is currently situated. In the same vein, if Washington desires a more intimate relationship with Brazil, it must abandon any aspiration to entice Brazil to join an anti-China coalition and acknowledge that an autonomous Brazil, which makes significant contributions to global food security, climate change, and regional security, can contribute to the advancement of a stable international order. U.S.-Brazil relations have been professional, if under-attended, and stable for a significant portion of the post-Cold War period. However, this has not been the case recently. 

The election of former U.S. President Donald Trump resulted in uncertainty and disarray


As it did in numerous aspects of American foreign relations. It is ironic that the subsequent election of Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro resulted in the establishment of a positive channel at the top, despite the fact that it caused a state of disorder in Brazilian governance. The relationship was left with a significant question mark when U.S. The relations between the United States and Brazil have undergone the following changes in the span of just over half a year: The historic return of Lula da Silva to the presidency; the dramatic attack on Brazil's Congress on January 8, which strongly echoed the January 6 attempted autogolpe in the United States; a visit to Brasília by U.S. National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan, which triggered the rapidly planned Biden-Lula summit in Washington, D.C. a month later; and a powerful statement of shared priorities between the region's two largest democracies. All of these events were significant.Two Lula was simultaneously emphasizing the importance of an autonomous foreign policy. He initiated the process by attempting to establish Brazil as a leader in the peace negotiations surrounding the Ukraine conflict, which included the use of shuttle diplomacy by Senior Policy Advisor Celso Amorim. In the context of Lula's trip to Beijing, his statements regarding the U.S. role in "encouraging" the war in Ukraine were the most prominent manifestation of this endeavor. These remarks were met with rare, public, and fierce opposition from the White House. 

The subsequent developments, which were also significant


Were met with less fanfare: the United States' decision to allocate $500 million to the Amazon Fund; the election of Dilma Rousseff as the president of the BRICS' New Development Bank, the most significant non-Western ordering institution, at a time when Washington is endeavoring to preserve the current order; the alignment between the United States and Brazil at the International Atomic Energy Agency in response to Chinese efforts to impede the high-priority Australia-U.K.-U.S. agreement on nuclear-powered submarines; and Lula's attendance at the G-7 Summit in Hiroshima, Japan. This is an impressive feat for a nation that is frequently overlooked and undervalued in a region that receives inadequate levels of attention in Washington. "There has been an underappreciation of the significance of this relationship in both Washington and, crucially, Brasília," as the renowned Brazilian think tank director Matias Spektor has observed.Four However, this is evolving. Regardless of the repercussions of Lula's Ukraine gambit and his rhetoric in China on U.S.-Brazil relations, the last few months have yielded a clear result: Brazil is reestablishing itself as a significant actor in global affairs and the most significant country in Latin America. Although there are long-standing diplomatic, institutional, commercial, and societal connections between the United States and Brazil, the official relationship will be increasingly viewed through the lens of a rapidly evolving world order. This will be through the prism of U.S.-China ties, broader geopolitical competition, and a rapidly changing geo-economic landscape. This is not solely due to the fact that the world's leading powers are vying for influence in every region of the world, including the Western Hemisphere; it is also due to the fact that both the United States and Brazil operate under a broader, global perspective. Tom Shannon Jr., the former U.S. 

Ambassador to Brazil, recently concisely stated that "both countries have global ambitions that extend far beyond their geography."


Although the geographical address of Brazil may be South America and that of the United States may be North America, the existential address of both countries extends far beyond our hemisphere. This implies that the bilateral relationship is not the only issue at hand. Both nations will be engaged in the endeavor to redefine the boundaries of the evolving international order, as they continue to influence the future of the region in the face of their respective internal challenges. Although the United States' role is undoubtedly more significant, prominent officials in Washington are increasingly acknowledging that Brazil is a potential significant partner—and, consequently, a potential significant obstacle—in the endeavor to safeguard and modify critical elements of an international order that is currently experiencing significant challenges.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Brazil and the USA: A Comparative Look at Urban Life

  National economies are propelled by cities These spaces are attractive to the most productive firms and the most talented workers due to the agglomeration advantages they generate, which are the primary cause for their existence. This environment is conducive to growth and development. Cities promote economic advancement by facilitating the sharing, matching, and learning of individuals and businesses through their high density (DURANTON; PUGA, 2004). Furthermore, Marshall (1890) asserted that ideas are "in the air," which implies that the mere concentration of individuals could result in novel outcomes. The functional role of each city in an urban system is contingent upon its ability to provide more specialized products and services to the surrounding areas (LÖSCH, 1964; CHRISTALLER, 1966). Given that population development enhances the capacity to generate economies of agglomeration and market potential, the centrality level of cities is also correlated with population s

The Biggest Brazilian Community in the USA: A Cultural Hub

To like, stop inflation, the policymakers of the first military government were like, "Yo, let's introduce this sick package that includes: a) cutting government deficits; b) controlling the money flow; and c) adjusting wages based on inflation and productivity. It's gonna be lit, fam! The plan totally flopped on its initial goals - only 10% in '66 - but it did manage to bring down inflation from a crazy 89.9% in '64 to 37.9% in '66 and 26.5% in '67. Furthermore, Figure 3 below flexes a steady drop in inflation rates throughout the economic miracle. By Brazilian standards, the period was like, totally lit in controlling price rises. Which parts of the anti-inflation policies actually stopped inflation tho? The Poli Econ of the Stabilisation Policy wage dropped steadily from 1964 up to 1968 and then kept almost constant throughout the "economic miracle." On the flip side, the "white collar" peeps were totally vibing with the economic bo

The Top Profitable Business Trends in Brazil

OMG, like the private banks were all about reducing credit stuff and focusing on investing in things from the public sector. So lit, right? First, banks like totally shifted credit stuff from private sector to public entities (check out Table 38 below). Second, the foreign currency remunerated deposits in the BACEN (regulated by the Circular Letter 230) became hella popular amongst commercial banks. OMG, in 1978 those deposits were only like 1.6% of the banks' total assets. But then in December 1979 and February 1983, they went cray and increased like six times. By 1983, they were like 9.3% of all the commercial banks' assets. OMG, in 1979, public securities were only, like, 17% of the investments in shares and securities. But in 1983, they were, like, a whopping 80%! Yo, peep Figure 18 up there, it's all about the financialisation of the non-financial corporation market value. Like, a big chunk of those financial investments were totally tied to the value of public bonds c